[affmage source="chitika" results="0"][/affmage]
seo moz

Ineffective Dmoz

Webmaster, the sides have always tried in the open DMOZ-listed, they have found a Hit and Miss be tried. Experiments to speed up the process make it worse, attempts to gain the acceptance status, can still make it worse, and in an industry only a few years old, take many years, before any inclusion can be experienced, if at all. If DMOZ is the directory that it believes to be himself, it should look like that behave directory. Since virtually every Webmaster would agree with that – the opportunities in DMOZ even with the best location in the genre, with original content, with a Web site that visitors love, with strong and constant traffic, excellent page rank and much more – are incomplete, chancy and can deteriorate even rank a website, if any, included if the editor wants it. Good search engine optimization Companies such as ourselves (see author bio) achieve good rankings for their clients, with or without the Open Directory. However, a listing in the ODP facilitates this process by far, but the mysterious and arbitrary by the Open Directory template allows a far from open and unnecessarily frustrating. Here's why DMOZ has become the liability good results on the Web.

Submission: To submit DMOZ – will go DMOZ.org Webmaster, you will find the most appropriate category – fill in the Required fields and submit. Sometimes there is an automatic indicator of the success of the template (not the assumption, only the template), and sometimes it does not exist. If the template ? Occur If you try to submit again when the proposal was accepted – not only given – they are included the possibility of damage in the directory. If you submit more than once because you do not always have all the signs that the submission was successful – you will be seen as a spammer. Sites that are already accepted in the past may be, may now be in danger – and the one you try is now particularly vulnerable. Forum posts by DMOZ editors recommend This is totally false – that the process works optimally and submission success is always by e-mail. We know this to be disingenuous.

Attitude of the editorial: DMOZ editors think they are important. It is to say true, that they need a Webmaster responsibility they have been assigned to do tasks. Some editors live up to this responsibility with integrity – Most but not. ODP editors are doing things their own way, in their own time, and unfortunately – very important – to their own conditions. If you are not a side in just the right Way that is their right way – your website is not listed and you will never know if it still moved in the queue to a different editor, or simply rejected. From mid-2005 – there is no status coming out of DMOZ.

Prima donnas: Similar to above – most think they are DMOZ editors a cut above the rest of us. You think they are the key to life or death – it does appear that meritocratic reasons they were chosen to power over the webmasters who have come swing they crawl on their case to represent. The problem starts at the top – the senior editors are freaks who have been in the top hierarchy of the DMOZ operating system since the time that just computer geeks were really interested in the role. Like many geeks, they are very intelligent, but somehow in touch with aspects of the real world. Aspects of great importance for an individual webmaster are not with the care of experienced editors and those who remain subject to slip down the pecking order to monitor. Prima donnas? Attempt to contact them to find out all the information meets with the reaction similar to some high officials have approached inappropriate. The Prima Donna's by DMOZ are the only interface between the Webmaster and the list – and if they mishandled the webmaster they react with the attitude of some offended movie star, and they're gone, their Followers in a huff. How can something so important to be managed so ridiculous? It's only a matter of time before Google, the search engine that uses the repository more than other search engines the same conclusion (that have other, reasonable, their own).

Questions: After presenting a site to DMOZ – you can Just check progress on the way – right? Wrong. Ask at your own risk. Before the beginning of 2005 had a DMOZ forum, where progress could be reviewed – Although the forum was among the responses of the editors with all the characteristics set forth in this article. It was a difficult and Arcane way to get information and slightly better than nothing. Now there is nothing. But there are editors for each section – you could not just contact them and ask for status? No, as previously warned – check You are at risk. It is almost certainly in a negative effect on the reception of your website potential outcome. The temptation with one of the prima donnas DMOZ is called strong. It can everything you have – but we can not say the result is good – so think carefully about the wording and attitude. It can be difficult to find their e-mail address – If yes, this is an indication that they do not want to be contacted. It is a closed organization and it's just surprising that the major search engine Google such high regard has a bad structure served as DMOZ.

Become Editor: Since the order for editors seems to be large – the obvious Attitude of the webmaster is to the editor of one. One could imagine that such an organization would welcome such assistance free of charge. However, if a Website provided and explain your situation (if not it will conduct a search), it is to block in the vast majority of cases. The intention to support each well and the quality to add sites to the index – but they assume you just want to get only on your own site Could a Webmaster ethical obligations – there is little other choice, as long as Google rewards the list with such kudos? Sites must be listed with the directory – and the fact that there is such a hit and miss tracking is frustrating and futile. There are not enough editors, not the editors do not approach their responsibilities with due care and it is not easy to accept new editors in the organization. How does it do? It can not. Google should see the obvious truth in this.

DMOZ Corruption: One hesitates to accuse – but the forum posts so many webmasters complaining of corruption and apparent comments of the editors, who themselves say, they are not corrupt, but lead one to conclude that corruption in the MON. There are editors who do not accept simply pages in a category where the site competes with existing sites they have a financial interest are logged in, it is editors that is not listed no worse than a website. To change the description of the site, the default search on Google ads displayed so that surfers do not have the site approved as appropriate their search (as of mid 2006, a Google "NOODP 'Tag used to overcome this – but the knowledge of this mechanism is not widespread). There are editors that in forums that are even say that they invite to be paid one listed on a Web site – payments to the e-mail address, along with sometimes appear to be made will have booked Details of the editor, and others by seeking a web editor for names that can be found. There are editors who consciously try out other editors that a very high queue have the pages to check is not there and who are much on the reduction of the workload and the system passed over to them, which delays the site Consideration for maybe 2 or 3 years! When it finally turned back on the right editor, the editor can do the same with others laden editor. A contribution in the forum by a supposed editor said that he combines the above two techniques, by finally adding the site in its category after it in the run-around for few years, then the change in the description of the site to drive visitors. This is dysfunctional to the point that attract the most objective observer to conclude would the existence of corruption. Sites that are a small company there with one or two hard-working employees have this kind of behavior, with grippers – the webmaster near powerless – Google should recognize this and reduce the value they attribute to a DMOZ listing.

Why not just stop … to whine and other directories? We keep complaining more loudly, because have the search engine directories. Yahoo has one, has an MSN, etc. Google do well, but the juggernaut of search industry Arcane has this excuse for a directory chosen by the World Web sites. There are no sites in the world – only a tiny snapshot. Webmasters know the wildlife of the list but it is the adoption by the Google Webmaster of this goal leaves with a feeling of frustration. They are selected directory and it is impossible to her, it was because to get through a stroke of luck for one of the beautiful and gracious and masterful pass geek DMOZ editors.

What to do? If DMOZ is still to choose in the list of Google for the solution is obvious. A voluntary group assigned to do something as important is a bad business model. The editors have paid staff, and the system must be fair, instead of the mysterious and very likely damaged. We struggle to see how Google does not already appear to recognize this – it is obviously bright. Another solution would be a win-win for both parties concerned. The two parties are a webmaster and Google DMOZ connected. Google DMOZ could either junk or you buy it. If they junk – to build a different directory. Then, with the new directory or with the purchased DMOZ Webmaster free for commercial Website account such as Yahoo do. Yahoo is far too expensive, particularly for small companies, but represented webmasters of websites small businesses would be happy one significant sum like $ 100 for a one-time fee to pay compensation in such a directory listing of heavy weight. Webmasters would pay with a smile – content, the previous DMOZ farce is over.

Conclusion: There is no doubt that DMOZ directory is an important one. But does his arcane nature of the operation it a liability, as appropriate Google ads are concerned. The submission does not work properly. Editors have a royal attitude toward their assigned Responsibility and act like prima donnas in their work. There is no way, no status of sites, sites may have been rejected or still in the queue, and find out any attempt to, to bring things back in order of listing is at risk if it is still in the queue. You can not have an editor if you try a site list, and reports on Corruption is so widespread that it must be at least probable. For inclusion in the Open Directory has such an influence on production or the breaking of a small company, DMOZ is a travesty of justice and undue influence on the ranking of websites by the search behemoth Google. We believe it's only a matter of time until Google acknowledges this.

About the Author

By Baron Turner of TurnerDow Premier Search Engine Optimisation, a British Web Optimisation company specialising in SEO, SEM, PPC Management

SMX Sydney Australia: SEO Moz founder Rand Fishkin is interviewed for The Interzone TV

[affmage source="amazon" results=""]seo moz[/affmage]
[affmage source="cj" results=""]seo moz[/affmage]
[affmage source="clickbank" results=""]seo moz[/affmage]

Tagged with: • • • • • • • • •

Filed under: Uncategorized

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!